![]()
[<<]Message[>>] [<<]Author[>>] Subject[>>] Thread[>>]
Number : 2451 Date : 2002-07-11 Author : Kan Yabumoto Subject : XCOPY-compatibility Size(KB) : 2
Hi, All: Microsoft's XCOPY that comes with Windows XP (let us call it XCOPY-XP) has been revised. Now, the new XCOPY-XP version made some small catch up with XXCOPY. Here are a list of new switches (and their counterpart in XXCOPY) XCOPY-XP XXCOPY ------------------------------------------------------------------- /EXCLUDE:[+,...] /EX /EX /G (default operation) /o /SC1 /X /SC3 /Z /(new switch) In the past, whenever Microsoft added a new switch, it collided with XXCOPY's existing switch. For example, when XCOPY added the /N switch, we had to rename the then /N switch to /NX. Now, we already have the /SC1 and /SC3 switches that are equivalent to XCOPY's new /o and /X switches, respectively. Recently, we had to deal with the pitfall in XCOPY's filename matching algorithm which could have easily been averted by the /NP. When we introduced the /NP switch, we refrained ourselves from making the default setting of the new (and improved) behavior by the /NP switch. The whole reason for not making the improved behavior the default was the XCOPY-compatibility. But, we started to have question in this policy. Seriously, who on earth benefits from the full compatibility in the /NP0 behavior (to let the SFN name matching prevail even when LFN does not match)? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Maybe, the time has come for our XCOPY-compatibility policy to end. That is, we are seriously considering a "freeze" in the XCOPY-compatibility at the current level. The consequence of this is that the existing XXCOPY switches which are equivalent to XCOPY's newly added switches (shown above) will not be reassigned, but be left as they currently are. Also, we will make /NP to be the default setting (unless you want a full XCOPY-compatibility in filename matching (by /NP0). ==================================================================== Please give us your feedback on this issue. I want as many of you to respond to the following questions: 1 [ ] I want current XXCOPY's switch left as is (/EX/SC1/SC3) [ ] I want full XCOPY-compatibility (reassign /EX/SC1/SC3/X/Z) [ ] I don't know the issue very well. 2 [ ] I want /NP (precise-name matching) to be the default. [ ] I want /NP0 (XCOPY-compatible behavior) to be the default. [ ] I don't know the issue very well. ===================================================================== Kan Yabumoto
This message if part of XXCOPY's message Archive. The archive contains all the messages posted at Yahoo!Groups: XXCOPY.