![]()
[<<]Message[>>] [<<]Author[>>] [<<]Subject [<<]Thread
Number : 2835 Date : 2002-09-21 Author : Brian Phillips Subject : Re: Full path v wild cards Size(KB) : 1
In message , Kan=20 Yabumoto writes >Brian: >The only logical explanation is that you have not removed >all the hidden and system attributes from *ALL* of the >directory (or the files themselves) that are involved. > >Your contrasting experiment (with and without the /H switch) >unequivocally proves that this is the case. >=A0=A0=A0 -------------------------------------------------------- >=A0=A0=A0=A0 In my previous message, I used an ambiguous statement: > >=A0=A0=A0=A0 >In my case, I did not add /H which may be >=A0=A0=A0=A0 >necessary if the file has the hidden/system file >=A0=A0=A0=A0 >attributes (or in a hidden/system directory). > >=A0=A0=A0=A0 I should have said that the /H switch *IS* required >=A0=A0=A0=A0 if the fullpath contains a hidden or system >=A0=A0=A0=A0 directory/path.=A0 That is, /H is not an option but >=A0=A0=A0=A0 a MUST in such cases. >=A0=A0=A0 -------------------------------------------------------- > >Then, there is a very small chance that could be... >I'm not sure whether or not the file/directory "caching" >mechanism which are assumed to be implemented in the >Windows system has a subtle "bug" with regard to the >hiddenness of a directory attributes --- I assume a reboot >of the system would get around this scenario. >(Of course, we always reserve the right to later admit >that it is a form of bug on our product :-) > >Regards, >Kan Yabumoto Thanks Kan Whether there is a bug or not (in xxcopy or Win 2000), or whether, as I=20 suspect, there is some quirk in the Word program, the /h switch=20 provides a simple work around with no apparent side effects. Brian
This message if part of XXCOPY's message Archive. The archive contains all the messages posted at Yahoo!Groups: XXCOPY.