![]()
[<<]Message[>>] [<<]Author[>>] [<<]Subject[>>] [<<]Thread[>>]
Number : 4086 Date : 2003-03-21 Author : Bud Man Subject : Re: My XXCOPY Experiences Size(KB) : 1
Yes, I've tried it with two identical drives. The data copies fine, but the drive boots only to the startup screen, and hangs from there. There's just enough of a difference between 2000 and XP to prevent it from cloning completely. Oh well. At least I can do all the other OS's... PEACE Bud --- In xxcopy@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Weir" wrote: > Have you tried your three disk scheme to clone XP between two > "identical" disks - that is the same make,size,type etc? I > suspect XP may check the volume serial numbers to prevent such > "unauthorised" duplication but I hope it cannot exclude a slave > disk which was present at XP installation time from being used as > master (after cloning) with the original master re-set as the > slave. Glad that someone is trying the third disk method for a > bootable XP clone and hope you are successful. It won't be too > bad if just the initial clone to a bootable disk needs the third > disk, provided that subsequent re-cloning between just two disks > is O.K. The third disk is also a way to avoid the delays from > "always in use" _RESTORE files in ME (&XP?) but, with a restart > included would probably not save time overall. > Regards, > > Bob
This message if part of XXCOPY's message Archive. The archive contains all the messages posted at Yahoo!Groups: XXCOPY.