![]()
[<<]Message[>>] [<<]Author[>>] [<<]Subject[>>] [<<]Thread[>>]
Number : 4479 Date : 2003-04-30 Author : CBFalconer Subject : Re: The Partition thing (OT?) Size(KB) : 0
Kan Yabumoto wrote: > ... snip ... > > ---------------------------------------------------- > One big benefit of the driveletter assignment > scheme used by NT/2K/XP is that the driveletters > remain the same even if one disk accidentally > fails at the system boot time ---- it could lead > to a disaster if you don't notice such a problem > and perform a daily-backup (XXCOPY C:\ D:\ /CLONE). > ----------------------------------------------------- I believe you can verify this by use of the disk volume label and/or volume serial num. You could restrict the verification to the use of root directories, as above (but watch out for SUBST drives). Where to keep the information is another problem - maybe a configuration file? Of course for XP cloning you need to make those labels/serial identical, which complicates things :-( -- Chuck F (cbfalconer@y...) (cbfalconer@w...) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. USE worldnet address!
This message if part of XXCOPY's message Archive. The archive contains all the messages posted at Yahoo!Groups: XXCOPY.