[<<]Message[>>]    [<<]Author[>>]    [<<]Subject[>>]    [<<]Thread[>>]

Number   :  8632
Date     :  2004-09-01
Author   :  des4212001
Subject  :  Re: Those Other Instances of NTUSER.DAT & UsrClass.DAT
Size(KB) :  2


That's nice... but let me put it a different way...

They are there, superhidden or whatever. What I'd like know is, are 
they required or not to make a copy complete? Does "automatically 
created by WinXP" mean no, a booting copy will generate same? Much 
as Nethood, Printhood, etc.?

Sorry, I'm slow, simple, and lazy about these things!

Thanks: DES

--- In xxcopy@yahoogroups.com, "Douglas Cohn"  
wrote:
> Here's a link
> 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/xpusrd
at.mspx
> 
> LocalService and NetworkService Profiles
> 
> The LocalService and NetworkService profiles are automatically 
created by
> Windows XP for two new built in user accounts that are used by the 
Service
> Control Manager to host services that do not need to run as the 
local system
> account. While these two new profiles are normal user profiles, 
because they
> are required by the system to run, they are treated slightly 
differently:
> 
> . LocalService and NetworkService profiles are not shown in the 
profiles
> list on the system properties dialog.
> 
> . Both LocalService and NetworkService profiles are located in
> %systemroot%\Documents and Settings by default, but are marked as 
super
> hidden so that they are not ordinarily visible.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: des4212001 [mailto:des421@c...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 1:44 PM
> To: xxcopy@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [xxcopy] Those Other Instances of NTUSER.DAT & 
UsrClass.DAT
> 
> The 2 smaller instances of these 2 files, down the Docs &
> Settings\LocalService & NetworkService paths. If anyone can tell 
me what
> they are, it will be here.
> 
> Lars Hederer won't answer. ERUNT doesn't save\restore them 
(directly). I
> ass-u-me they aren't actually necessary. But would really like to 
know
> positively.
> 
> I finally started using xxcopy, after following it for a year now. 
> And you know what? It works, ah, better than what I'd been using! 
> Well, a lot better actually.
> 
> Hey, multiple solutions is good. My other method can force NT Hives
> (.dat) and hence copies the above.
> 
> DES



This message if part of XXCOPY's message Archive.
The archive contains all the messages posted at Yahoo!Groups: XXCOPY.